James H. Shelton III

Innovating Education:

An Interview with James H. Shelton III

James H. Shelton III, Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement at the U.S. Department of Education, manages a portfolio that includes most of the Department’s competitive teacher quality, school choice and learning technology programs. He is also involved in the development of and grant process for the $4.35 billion Race to the Top Fund, and the $650 million Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund, both part of the $787 billion American Reinvestment and Recovery Act Funds.

This and other insightful articles can be found in the Winter 2010 edition of the District Management Journal.

Read more: Innovating Education: An Interview with James H. Shelton III

 

What Have You Heard from your Stakeholders Lately?

Often external stakeholders such as board members or parents are important voices that have little understanding of the difficult decisions like  that must be made within a district. People tend to be oriented to specific issues rather than about the system as a whole. As districts reengage diverse groups of stakeholders to seek input regarding priorities, they should consider the stakeholder roles and attitudes as well as the communication priorities of the district decision-makers.

How do I educate and engage district supporters proactively ?

In turn, all key stakeholder groups need to be appropriately informed about ongoing district decision making to build awareness and buy-in regarding key decisions.  Messages need to be coordinated and reinforced, and conflicting agendas need to be taken into consideration for an effective communications strategy.  Stakeholder groups have varying perspectives and concerns and will respond differently to key messaging.  Key questions to address regarding messaging should include:

  • What messages resonate with key stakeholder groups?
  • How should messaging vary by stakeholder group?
  • What channels can be used to most effectively deliver key messages?
  • When and how often should FCPS reach out to key stakeholders?

What District Leaders Can Do

How should districts go about this type of research and communications activity?  Often, organizations will conduct broad surveys to measure overall satisfaction of a diverse group of stakeholders.  Unfortunately, satisfaction studies are often designed to affirm current management practices and strategies rather than unearth opportunities to better serve stakeholders.  DMC recommends evaluating stakeholder input through a dedicated audit process.  Communications audit research should be designed to seek out actionable information about what to do differently.

DMC recommends using both qualitative and quantitative research methods to arrive at actionable insights.  These efforts should be complementary.  In recent efforts with districts, DMC has used a variety of approaches and sources to arrive at new insights regarding district operations and key messaging, including quantitative online and telephone surveys, interviews of key individual stakeholders and groups, organized focus groups, and complementary internal questionnaires.  Ultimately, audit processes should use both qualitative and quantitative methods to reinforce outcomes and insights.

DMC Research Tips

In our work on communications strategy and stakeholder engagement, we have learned that districts need to take careful steps to maximize their efforts:

  • First, districts should always pilot all qualitative and quantitative research with extensive tests for 1) question style and structure and 2) execution logistics and technology. The power of email and the internet allows for unprecedented ease of data gathering, but requires vigilance for not making small mistakes that can invalidate the success of the effort.
  • Choose your sample (your target respondents) carefully.  Over time it makes sense to manage these lists to not over-survey people.
  • Always send test emails and complete test data extractions:  once your survey is out it needs to be working flawlessly.
  • Questions should be well-defined, specific, and quick to answer.  An ideal survey should take well under ten minutes to complete.

Also, regular audits should uncover insights regarding high-level priorities and possible service enhancements.  Just as importantly, they help establish a baseline for performance. Defining and tracking success over time may require different measurements at different levels of the organization.  Incremental service changes can be the foundation for dramatic shifts in public perception. Even seemingly minor tweaks to a stakeholder’s experience can drive significant change in perception.

In summary, stakeholder engagement on understanding key programmatic and operating tradeoffs is critical for creating a fiscal plan that reflects community priorities.  Districts should reevaluate their communications and community outreach protocols and harness opportunities to listen and reflect on stakeholder opinions and priorities.  Operating and programmatic considerations may surprise district leaders, and communications strategy should be adjusted accordingly.

For more about DMC’s work on fiscal management, click here

For more about DMC’s work in strategic communications and stakeholder engagement, click here

   

District Management Journal

District Management Journal. Winter 2010. Vol 3.Winter 2010. Vol 3.

An in-depth, unbiased information resource that provides actionable insights on how to better lead and manage your school district.

Download now!

Special Education Support

District and Community Partners
Learn about our Special Education Support Services